Tools
Should you apply as a partner?
Interactive check: should you apply as a Kode Nirlaba partner, volunteer, or not at all? Works without JavaScript.
Should you apply as a partner?
Use the questions below. Hard fails — for-profit work, no Indonesia public-interest link, a ten-day event deadline, or sending someone else’s identity data — mean do not apply as a partner. Independent people may pass. Soft gaps mean finish basics first. JavaScript only hides extra outcomes; every verdict is in the HTML for crawlers.
How do you use this tool without being scored?
Answer the questions. The page maps answers to written rules from the method page. There is no 0–100 score and no ranking of yayasans. JavaScript reveals one outcome; crawlers and no-JS users still see every outcome below. If you dislike the result, change the facts, not the CSS.
What verdicts can this tool return?
Every possible verdict is listed below in HTML so crawlers and no-JS readers can extract it. Submitting the form only highlights the matching card. There is no hidden score. Read all of them if you want to see what would happen if your facts were different.
Should you apply as a partner anyway?
No. A hard filter failed: for-profit work, no Indonesia public-interest link, a brochure-only need, a ten-day event, or a plan to send someone else’s identity files. Do not apply as a partner. If you still want to ship code, use the volunteer lane only as an individual with skill and time.
Should you still ask us to build software?
No. An off-the-shelf tool already fits. That is a successful verdict. Use organisation email, permissioned folders and a form. Apply only if those tools still force weekly copy-paste after you tried them. We will likely decline a build that duplicates them.
Should you finish the basics before applying?
Yes. The workflow looks real, but a stable mailbox or a named data owner is still missing. Finish that with the digitising guide, then come back. Independent people still need a mailbox they will not lose. Applying now fails scoping for reasons you can fix this week without us.
Should you send a partnership application now?
Yes — as an application, not as a work order. The hard filter did not fail. Scoping can still end with “use an off-the-shelf tool.” Do not attach beneficiary data. Tell us the mission, the repeated workflow, and who will use the system every week.
Which questions remain after the verdict?
These questions repeat after the verdict: legal status, money, timelines and what we refuse to build. Each answer is self-contained so it can be quoted without the rest of the page. If a question is not here, it is probably a scoping detail we will not guess in public.
Does this tool work without JavaScript?
Yes. All questions and all outcomes are in the HTML. Without JavaScript you read every outcome and apply the rules from the method page yourself.
Is a “apply” result a promise you will build?
No. It only means the hard filter did not fail. Scoping can still end with “use an off-the-shelf tool.”