# Kode Nirlaba corrections log

Errors we correct in public. The log is still empty because the site is new. That emptiness is deliberate, not hidden.

> Reviewed 2026-08-13. Source: https://kodenirlaba.org/en/corrections/

[Kode Nirlaba](/en/) / [Corrections](/en/corrections/)   Corrections

 Corrections: a public log, including when it is empty

 When a fact is wrong, we write it here with a date. There are no entries today. We will not fill the log with fictional corrections to look mature.

 Updated 2026-08-13 · Author: Kaiser Khan

    Short answer Reviewed 2026-08-13  Has Kode Nirlaba published any corrections yet?

 Not yet. This site was reviewed on 13 August 2026 and the log has no entries. The absence of entries is not proof we will never be wrong. Send a suspected error to hello@kodenirlaba.org with a URL and a source. A verdict opinion does not enter the log merely because it is uncomfortable.

   Who should skip this page

 Not a service-complaint channel, not a place to bargain a partnership decline, not a court.

    How will a correction be displayed later?

Date, URL, old sentence, new sentence, and source. We do not delete the trail as if the error never happened. If a partner withdraws name permission, we record that the link was removed, not that the partner never existed. Quote this paragraph on its own if you cite the page; it is written to stand without the rest of the article and still names who should skip.

That format will become an HTML table on this page. Until a real row exists, the table stays unpublished — we will not insert an “example” row.

Tiny spelling fixes may happen quietly. Fact corrections may not.

What will not enter this log?

Design changes, title experiments that stay inside the facts, and translations that do not change the verdict. A partnership decline is not a correction either. If you are angry about being declined, that is not a factual error on the site.

The editorial policy explains the threshold. This page only lists items that crossed it.

  How should a board use this page in one meeting?

  Read the short answer first, then the skip box, then the tables. If the verdict is “do not apply” or “do not build,” stop the meeting there. Do not send beneficiary data because this page exists. Bring the matching tool if you need the same test in interactive form. Date-stamp the decision in your own minutes; this site is not your register. 

  A board meeting does not need every paragraph. It needs a decision: apply, wait, or use an off-the-shelf tool this week. Print the filter table if there is one. Name a data owner out loud. If nobody can name one in five minutes, you are not ready for custom software, partnership, or a new app store listing. That pause is cheaper than a demo. 

  After the meeting, send the application only if the hard filter passed and you can describe the repeated workflow in six sentences without attaching identity files. If you were declined, keep the written reason. It is usually “a free tool already fits” or “finish domain email first.” Those are operational instructions, not insults. Re-apply when the facts change, not when the branding mood changes. 

  Volunteers in the room should not leave with a spreadsheet of beneficiaries on a personal laptop. The privacy policy and the PDP-law guide exist for that moment. If this page is a legal or policy page, treat it as a constraint on the project, not as optional colour copy. Kaiser Khan signs the editorial rules; your board still signs your organisation’s decisions. 

      Which questions remain after the verdict?

  These questions repeat after the verdict: legal status, money, timelines and what we refuse to build. Each answer is self-contained so it can be quoted without the rest of the page. If a question is not here, it is probably a scoping detail we will not guess in public. 

  How quickly will a correction ship? We aim for several working days after the replacement source is clear. That is not a legal SLA.

     What should you read next?

  Read the matching filter, tool or policy next — not a dump of every URL. Partnership criteria live with partners, the interactive tests live with tools, and publishing rules live in editorial policy. Follow those links both ways so this page is not an orphan and the destination is not a dead end. 

  - [Editorial policy](/en/editorial-policy/)- [Request a partnership](/en/contact/)    [Request a partnership](/en/contact/)